Draft papers, proofs and correspondence of 1928-31
Archive Collections
/
Ursula Hope McConnel
/
Draft papers, proofs and correspondence of 1928-31
Collection: Ursula Hope McConnel
Series Identifier: AA 191/03
Included Items
AA 191/03/01 -
Title: 'Comparison with dream processes'.
AA 191/03/02 -
Handwritten notes in English
AA 191/03/03 -
Title: 'Tradition and social reform'.
AA 191/03/04 -
Title: 'Tradition and social reform'.
AA 191/03/05 -
'The Cinderella of the Sciences (cf. medicine, social work)'.
AA 191/03/06 -
A brief survey of culture-contact problems in north Queensland
AA 191/03/07 -
'A brief survey of culture-contact problems in north Queensland'
AA 191/03/08 -
Notes for a presentation, giving an account of McConnel's field work in western Cape York Peninsula. Same topics as the above, but more completed prose in the writing.
AA 191/03/09 -
Uncorrected galley proof for McConnel 1930b.
AA 191/03/10 -
Corrected galley proof for McConnel 1930b, with original for diagram published in McConnel 1930b:186.
AA 191/03/11 -
Title on front: 'Work in process of completion'. Title on back: 'Durkheim'
AA 191/03/12 -
Letter to Dear Madam from A.C. Haddon 21 September 1930, on letterhead of 3 Cranmer Road, Cambridge.
AA 191/03/13 -
Letter from JB Cleland to McConnel 18.7.30 with attached scheme for field work on the sex life of a primitive group, part of a survey by Clark Wissler
AA 191/03/14 -
Title: 'Sex life amongst the Australian Aborigines. No. 14. Information Supplied by Miss Ursula McConnel Concerning the Natives of Cape York Peninsula, Australia'.
AA 191/03/15 -
Letter to Miss McConnel from A.C. Haddon 18 March 1931, on letterhead of 3 Cranmer Road, Cambridge.
AA 191/03/16 -
Copy of letter from McConnel to JB Cleland 20.4.31 regarding corrections and alterations to the Moon Legend, plus attached list of corrections; see McConnel 1931b
AA 191/03/17 -
'Symbolism as a mental process' on title sheet, along with McConnel's signature, plus 'Psyche'.
AA 191/03/18 -
Undated letter from Elton Mayo to Ursula, commenting on her paper (unnamed), and critiquing the then state of psychological theory.